Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Raoul M's avatar

As always, enjoyed y'all's thoughts!

Do you see LLM based check-ins (for lack of a better term) as completely unsupervised? Similar to Dr. Attia's question below, would the future be via a medical device approval pathway and/or would providers be able to build their own agents and, perhaps, have to attest that they will supervise/keep a human in the loop as the agents interact with their patient panel? Really hard questions that we'll have to answer in the coming months and years.

Expand full comment
Cyrus Attia, M.D.'s avatar

Love this, thanks for a very relevant article!

I am unabashedly bullish on the necessary (and inevitable?) adoption of ML-powered tools in healthcare, and not just for front office functions like automated charting. These tools should start to touch care relationships directly, in my view. Two follow-ups come to mind:

First, what are some other data streams you all would like to see feeding into such ML-powered tools? Continuous engagement with an LLM itself would provide useful data, but I wonder if there's an opportunity to layer on additional insights from, say, the patient's smartphone, at-home wearables, etc.

Second, when, if at all, do you think we'll see an LLM approved as a SaMD to provide CBT for certain conditions, like mild/moderate depression? To my knowledge, healthcare still hasn't crossed this rubicon, but I wonder what your thoughts are on pros/cons.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts